« Listen to Anne-a-Grams | Main | Florida, here we come! »
March 18, 2008
Good for the goose, but not the gander?Education Secretary Margaret Spellings announced today that she will allow as many as 10 states to use a "differentiated accountability" system to target interventions/sanctions for chronically low-performing schools rather than to treat all schools that didn't make AYP under NCLB the same way, see this.
That's good news, on the surface. But BoardBuzz has to wonder, why only 10 states? If a differentiated accountability system is good for the goose, why not for the gander? If it's a fairer and more accurate measurement and helps target limited resources to schools and students most in need, why isn't that good for all states? We are talking about accountability that can have serious consequences for schools, so why should one state be allowed to have a fair system, while another would continue to be subject to the current one-size-fits-all accountability framework? Good questions, all.
Spellings wants to give this flexibility in the form of a "pilot program," limiting the number of states that can implement the new framework. Sen. Edward Kennedy hit the nail on the head in responding to the annoucement:
But schools need more than new pilot programs to respond to No Child Left Behind’s challenges. I commend Secretary Spellings for giving schools greater flexibility, but experience shows it won’t get us very far as long as the Bush Administration continues to shortchange its budget for school reform.
Posted March 18, 2008 4:23 PM | No Child Left Behind
Trackback Pings
BoardBuzz Feed
